According to the principle of Occam's Razor, the simplest solution is most likely to be the correct and optimal one.
We are trying to communicate with professional bureaucrats, the public, politicians and other non-technical professionals about the problems associated with the counterfeiting of commercial securities associated with short selling manipulations, the objective of which is to launder money while avoiding taxes.
There is the classic old quote: "He who sells what isn't his'n, must give it back or go to prison." What can any non-technical professional or non-professional (like a Jury?) understand? Someone can't sell what he doesn't own. The regulators and manipulators would have you believe that securities, which are nothing more than a form of title, need to be exempted from this rule, in the name of more efficient markets.
The core problem of the regulators is that they choose to selectively ignore the principles of the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights, laws prohibiting inverse taking, and an enormous body of case law on title in the process.
We have been casting around with how to communicate with the Congress and others who might straighten out the potentially catastrophic mess we are in. We have gotten too much into how the frauds are executed, rather than the intent of the frauds.
We must go back to basics. If we can't explain our problem in a single paragraph of three or four short sentences, then we can't expect politicians to understand what we are saying.
If we hammer the basics in every piece we put out, and we MUST do this marketing job more effectively, we will imprint the public and those accountable to them with phrasing and understanding of the problem that even the lowest IQ can handle. Conversely, by taking this path, we insure the most likely result of hammering the enemy here into the ground like a stake, as they can't justify their behavior with anything intelligible.
We must engage in full scale never-ending intellectual war in the manner of the original Marxist movements, which is despicable at it core, but whose arguments never admit defeat.
We must abandon explanations of HOW this fraud is being perpetrated, and focus on WHY it is being perpetrated.
While this may be compared mathematically to the problems of Quantum Physics, we will never win our case using that kind of information as a hammer.
Look at the tactics of all modern successful power movements, such as the movement to give women the vote of the Suffragettes. We need exactly the corresponding power over institutional corruption here.
It isn't possible to argue with this. We need to stop trying to be Mandarins, and act like a large angry public body. Nothing else will work.