September 06, 2008     | Register

1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg.

Location: Blogs Bud Burrell - Front and Center    
Posted by:   bburrell 3/15/2007 12:24 PM

This was forwarded to me by a victim and champion of this cause.

As for all the Elgindy fans out there, eat your own livers raw.

 

Subject: Response to Bloomberg Special

Thought everyone would like to see this. This is a huge response.

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fcre8P2UUY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efaulkingt

ruth%2Ecom%2F

From: gmatsumoto@bloomberg.net [mailto:gmatsumoto@bloomberg.net]

Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:13 AM

Subject: Fwd: Show is a real winner, Gary

fyi ... below are the first day Phantom Shares rankings on YouTube

----- Original Message -----

From: Buyins.net <tom@buyins.net>

At: 3/15 10:06:48

Gary,

I track all the statistics from the license I bought. Here is what has happened in only 1 day:

#13 - Most Viewed (Today) - News & Politics - All

#11 - Most Viewed (Today) - News & Politics - English

#84 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - All

#13 - Top Rated (Today) - News & Politics - All

#13 - Top Rated (Today) - News & Politics - English

#62 - Top Rated (This Week) - News & Politics - All

#52 - Most Discussed (Today) - News & Politics - All

#5 - Top Favorites (Today) - News & Politics - All

#5 - Top Favorites (Today) - News & Politics - English

#38 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - All

#33 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - English #40 - Most Linked (Today) - News & Politics - All

Permalink  |  Trackback
Comments (24)
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By b8nw84u on 3/15/2007 1:06 PM
If the video had a more eye catching title and a broader range of "tags", more people would see it. Just my take, but I am impressed with the views so far.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Howie on 3/15/2007 3:26 PM
Great Job!
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Howie on 3/15/2007 4:10 PM
If anyone out there has a MySpace, that might be a great venue to push this.....these rankings are extremely impressive....but, let's not stop there....Post this video, and/or even these rankings....in a bulletin through MySpace....it'll have immediately visibility to all on your friends list.....off to do mine now....Keep up the good work, everyone! America needs to see this.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By google on 3/15/2007 7:18 PM
We can be the number one video no google if only people would take the time to:

- register for free
- click on five for the rating
- add the video to your favorites
- make a comment
- link to the video from some site somewhere.

It feeds on itself. If a video is on the front page, it attracts more views, more favorites and stays on the front page.

The ratio to people who favorited it to people that viewed it is pathetic. GO BACK, REGISTER AND ADD IT TO YOUR FAVORITES.

Geesh...

Only 30 people favorite it and I am five of them under different emails...
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By cobwebs on 3/16/2007 6:36 AM
Do you ever wake up, pull the sleepers from your eyes and realize, "resistance isn't futile?"

Do you ever wake up, full of energy and go geez, that last snowflake is about to land and cause an avalanche of change?

Some scumbag controls the DTCC casino, the media, the electronic voting machines that claim to count our vote, yada yada yada,

but then you suddenly pull the sleepers from your eyes and realize he is a person you could go punch in the nose. This asshole needs to be removed from power. There are thousands of us and we don't care how much Steve Cohen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_A._Cohen is worth, we realize his nose still bleeds when punched. 100 million of us could probably beat up his sorry ass.

As soon as you realize that your friends who are cops and soliders feel the same way as you, then the scumbags money doesn't matter. We are big and they are small.

They are wrinkly old men behind the curtain, pulling rusty levers of power, not realizing there is a tidal wave coming that will make them obsolete. 911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!

Hear that meme again and spread it:

911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!
911 is different. Now the people are in charge!!!

As soon as the police, politicians and our military realize that these people need to be charged with treason, these people behind the curtain will realize power is fleeting.

A trillionaires head rolls into the basket as easily as a billionaires.

Right Steve Cohen?


Bud's Reply: Right on Target Cobwebs.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/16/2007 9:55 AM
Bud, your opinion please

OPEN LETTER TO CHRISTOPHER COX

March 16, 2007

To Christopher Cox:

Mr. Cox,

I am writing you about the issue of illegal naked shorting and the SEC. Wasn't there a Presidential Order handed down from the White House on January 18, 2007 ORDERING the removal of the Grandfather Clause from RegSHO? Since the answer is affirmative, why on earth does the SEC feel legally justified to keep discussing the order and not implementing it? After all, the President is the chief executor, meaning he is the head of each and every administrative department, including the SEC.... yes? When the boss says jump, you do not sit on your derriere and talk about it, you do it! Am I correct? If not, please elucidate me to the realities of a Presidential Order. Perhaps our President was putting on a performance with the issuance of this order. Perhaps your agency is in the dark as to the implications associated with the word “order.” If the latter 2 explanations are not applicable, I find it completely illogical, as well as illegal that your agency acts in such a cavalier manner to address a Presidential Order with a “whenever we get around to it” attitude. Your agency is simply unbelievable!

I wonder if the SEC would be so lackadaisical about crimes if it was your own homes being robbed or if your wives and children were being harmed and/or raped? Would your response be to immediately contact the police to stop the crimes or would you continue to stand around and talk about it for years while the thieves and rapists continue their pillage and plunder of your homes and families?. I know for a fact that you would personally have any attending cops' head on a platter for such indifference. What on earth makes the SEC and the rest of the alleged public servants any different?

While Americans get screwed royally at a rate of $6 billion per day and the American economy dies a rapid death, the SEC acts as a silent accomplice to these criminals by pretending to be taking corrective measures when in essence, your pretense insults the intelligence of every American. Personally, I alone have been strenuously complaining about naked shorting for over 8 years and not one step has been successfully taken to stop it - in 8 years! Of course, thousands of Americans have complained, but no matter the volume of the many voices, it appears that the paltry salary we pay you is insufficient to get you to do your jobs in the light of whatever other influence seems to guide you. In fact, this criminality has done nothing but increase with time. The criminals are mocking us as they rob us blind and your agency is one of the very instruments of their thievery. The majority of public servants have proven themselves to be nothing shy of villainous traitors to America and Americans. You have sold out your countrymen and all honor for a few dollars - what greater fool can there be? Most of you people of the public trust seem to fail in your understanding that God is watching and He is definitely taking notes. I promise you, He does not approve of such corruption.

I have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in the markets over the past 8 years, mostly due to this criminal conduct of naked shorting, in combination with the complicity of your agency and many others of our alleged honorable public servants. I do not write you this letter out of hate or anger, but with a great deal of pity. You all have such a terrible awakening coming to you, for this life is but a brief flash in time; yet, our relationship with God is truly eternal.

I pray you let God's wisdom be your guide you and not the pressure and influence from lawbreakers. May God keep you and protect you.

Sincerely,


Allan F. Treffry, Esq.

- - - - -
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By bburrell on 3/16/2007 10:00 AM
Cox's comments about this Wednesday at the Conference were an absolutely stunning reversal.

I will post them below.

SEC's Cox "SHO has proven insufficient to stop the problem"

Location: Blogs Dave Patch's Blog


Posted by: dpatch
3/15/2007 6:22 AM

Straight from DC and the US Chamber Summit on Capital Markets is the story the mainstream financial media will not be writing about.



In the Q&A session with Chairman Cox one in the audience had the opportunity to hit Cox Squarely where he stands. Transcripts below:



AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chairman Cox, Jonathan Johnson, Overstock.com. You have mentioned in the past that abusive naked short selling is being used to manipulate stock prices down to the detriment of investors. Last month, the Chamber sent a letter requesting that Congress hold hearings on the issue and last night Bloomberg TV ran a piece, a special report, on this issue. What is the commission doing to stop this form of manipulation and when can we expect some action?

CHAIRMAN COX: Abusive naked short selling is of great concern to the entire Commission, to all of our members and the professional staff at the SEC. The regulation that was first adopted to get after this and related problems, Reg SHO, has proven insufficient to stop the problem. One of the reasons is the Grandfather provision in the rule as it was originally adopted, so we are now setting out, as you know, to eliminate that grandfather provision. And we will do more. Just as Congress may well have hearings on this issue and seek to get more information, so too are we looking at this. As you know, there's a technological side to this. This is very closely connected to our system of clearing and settlement in a very very big market, and we want to make sure that we use technology as our friend in relating, potentially and at all times, ownership and particular shares rather than waiting until the end of an arbitrary period of time to match those things up. It's those sorts of things that I think will eventually help us, I think, put an end to this kind of abuse. And I know that people victimized by it have a great deal of right on their side to complain about it.

CHAIRMAN DONAHUE: You have a lot of support from here in getting that done. Just let us know how we can get some muscle behind it. It is a serious challenge.



I’m sorry, did the Chairman say that Regulation SHO has not worked? Doesn’t that imply that FRAUD exists and is not being corrected? Was this paltry $2 Million parking ticked to Goldman Sachs supposed to be the catch all deterrent?



For a decade the SEC has dismissed the allegations of “unsophisticated investors” and of small business issuers that they were being manipulated. We were all “loonies” that simply did not understand the markets and this issue we speak of is not real.



Wall Street and the media lobbied hard dismissing this issue. In fact the same individuals that claim “those that complain about short selling are simply those deflecting the real issues” are now they are the ones complaining that settlement issues, lawsuits, and those that report on it are all barking up the wrong tree. It almost sounds like short sellers who go after CEO’s for what they call distractions are creating their own…Distractions.



And for the Chairman to say “And I know that people victimized by it have a great deal of right on their side to complain about it.” That is not what Annette Nazareth had to say to Floyd Norris in 2005. In fact Ms. Nazareth claimed we were simply whiners mad because our stocks did not go up. I guess Nazareth doesn’t believe victims have a right to whine.



I guess after all is said and done we, this small universe of individuals, proved that we were smarter than all of Wall Street and Wall Street regulators.



We identified 10 years ago that a problem existed that the regulators, members of Wall Street, and regulators all denied existed.



We, the “unintelligent investors” identified in June 2004, when the SEC voted approval of the present Regulation SHO law, that the law was inadequate to resolve the problem. Wall Street was happy with the law, the crooks were happy with the law, SIFMA was happy to get another boatload of Wall Street funding for a job well done, and the regulators were too stupid to know otherwise but we knew. We came to conclusions the experts could not come to. We did so because we had the open minds, the capacity to see reality.



As for the Greenberg’s, Weiss’, Boyd’s, Nocera’s, McLean’s etc…while the data speaks for itself. These members of the financial media have the integrity of armed robber going into an old age community. They fail to reposnd to the needs of the people because they fear their careers will be destroyed when their crooked sources dry up.





Clearly there are members of the media in attendance at the Summit as they are constantly reporting the speaks positions being argued. Funny how 100% of them overlooked this comment.




e identified 10 years ago that a problem existed that the regulators, members of Wall Street, and regulators all denied existed.



We, the “unintelligent investors” identified in June 2004, when the SEC voted approval of the present Regulation SHO law, that the law was inadequate to resolve the problem. Wall Street was happy with the law, the crooks were happy with the law, SIFMA was happy to get another boatload of Wall Street funding for a job well done, and the regulators were too stupid to know otherwise but we knew. We came to conclusions the experts could not come to. We did so because we had the open minds, the capacity to see reality.



As for the Greenberg’s, Weiss’, Boyd’s, Nocera’s, McLean’s etc…while the data speaks for itself. These members of the financial media have the integrity of armed robber going into an old age community. They fail to reposnd to the needs of the people because they fear their careers will be destroyed when their crooked sources dry up.





Clearly there are members of the media in attendance at the Summit as they are constantly reporting the speaks positions being argued. Funny how 100% of them overlooked this comment.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By fighting back on 3/16/2007 12:19 PM
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=227579
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/16/2007 7:15 PM
I think this company has the right idea. Is it however the right appoach Bud?


Email this Release | Printer-Friendly

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PANAMERSA Corporation Reduces Authorized Shares by Over 4 Billion, Offers Current Share Holders up to $0.04
DALLAS, TX and PANAMA CITY -- (MARKET WIRE) -- March 16, 2007 -- The general council of Pan America Sociedad Anonima (MMVII) representing the four operating regions met yesterday to discuss the continued execution of the business plan made the following statement. "The general board of regions and the foundation council wants to make public that we are in compliance with all of our multi-jurisdictional codes of law and fully respect the self determination of each Pan American Region."

"Rampant naked short selling continues unabated in the region II capital market and is being used to manipulate and benefit the few insiders involved while destroying the entrepreneurs and small companies trying to follow the American dream," said Mike Terrell, CEO of PANAMERSA Corporation (PINKSHEETS: PNMS). "In our specific case, we release positive information about our company and the stock goes down due to the market manipulation."

For this reason PANAMERSA Corporation and the Board feel a move to a more stable exchange not only would benefit the Company but would allow the share holders the opportunity to have their share price based on earnings not blatantly reduced by manipulation. Because PANAMERSA Corporation does not depend on the selling of stock to pay basic salaries and expenses, the company has been able to move forward and has even made bold moves to protect shareholder's interests and increase share prices.

CEO Mike Terrell has been on a personal mission to increase the share price for all of the shareholders. Stated Terrell, "In the last 8 months I have done the following just to increase share price:


-- Reduced O/S by 4 billion in 6 months including 2 billion of my own
stock.
-- I declared a land dividend so every brokerage house would have to
certify each shareholders position. I would like to point out the land
dividend was paid by the company on time (conveyed to the Fundacion) The
only reason shareholders do not have their dividend today is your broker
does not feel compelled to certify what you actually own or just refuses to
give us that number. Or in another situation the broker certified 10
million more shares sold than they had to sell according to the DTC
position report. So until the Foundation has an exact count they will not
be paid. Make no mistake the shareholders of record earned and will get
their dividend, but not until their brokers certify who owns what.

"My job has not changed. I am here to increase share value, the basic job of a CEO. I will accomplish that despite manipulation, despite naked short sellers, because we will bury the doubters with profits and create a level playing field."
Our 30% share of the operating companies of the 4 operating regions has been paid in full. Our revenues derived from those regions are our share of the total operation. Our 4th Quarter assets have been certified as of December 31, 2006 which include 50 million in escrow and 29.4 million for expansion, both of which are a result of the sale of 2 billion restricted shares at $0.04. The remaining 19 million represent our consolidated 30% earnings from all regions. I can only certify amounts we receive. Because all of the operating companies are operating companies of the foundation their audited financials may not be disclosed publicly by law.

Effective immediately:


-- PANAMERSA Corporation authorized shares will be reduced by 4 billion
shares.

-- The Share buy back will begin in conjunction with a shareholder price
guarantee

-- A guarantee will be extended to loyal shareholders who wish to be a
part of PANAMERSA Corporation's future.

-- All shareholders who request their certificates from their broker and
exchange those shares for PDRs issued by the Fundacion and agree to hold
them for 1 year will be guaranteed a minimum price of $0.02 per share or
the current market price, which ever is greater, or the option to keep the
PDR. In addition each guaranteed PDR will be backed by Gold reserves.

-- All shareholders who request their certificates from their broker and
exchange those shares for PDRs issued by the Fundacion and agree to hold
them for 2 years will be guaranteed a minimum price of $0.04 per share or
the current market price, which ever is greater, or the option to keep the
PDR. In addition each guaranteed PDR will be backed by Gold reserves.

-- All PDRs are issued through the Fundacion Pan America.

"These are exciting times as PANAMERSA Corporation moves forward to take her place in history," said Terrell. "I am projecting great growth and strength within our organization for many years to come."

PANAMERSA Corporation (PINKSHEETS: PNMS) is a holding company for a group of business enterprises which promotes the commercial integration of Latin America into the economic development of the Western Hemisphere. PANAMERSA Corporation is engaged in global e-commerce and e-biz solutions offering interactive e-commerce and e-biz programs in addition to a range of goods and services online including: prepaid Debit cards; e-commerce merchant accounts; life insurance policies, gold transactions; telephony services, text messaging, VoIP, MicroForests properties, real estate investment participations, fixed and variable income real estate properties in Costa Rica and Panama, offshore financial services, asset management and protection; travel services, leisure, business, health, relocation services, and digital marketing services.

Forward-looking statements are not historical facts as "forward-looking statements" defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Our forward-looking statements are the result of profound analysis on trends in our globalizing economies that we anticipate in our industry. It is our good faith vision and estimate of the effect on the globalization, integration and electronic business trends will have on our company. Our statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties beyond our reasonable control that could cause the results of operations to differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Contact:
Investor Relations
214-774-4870
ir@panamersa.com


SOURCE: PANAMERSA Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back To Recent News
Issuers of news releases, not Market Wire, are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content.



Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By bburrell on 3/16/2007 7:17 PM
Sean,

PANAMERSA's is an approach, but this doesn't give me enough detail to determine if their counsel knows how to close the door on a detail technical level.

Cox has opened it, and there is a new game in town.

B.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Steve V on 3/17/2007 8:33 AM
Bud,

Do you know any companies that have the technical knowledge, ability and opportunity to do trap the ba$tard$ who have been screwing them for so long? I've been watching the shares of your trading company falter as well. Are you hinting that PVTM may be the next Tsunami.

Steve V.

Reply: PVTM is not the Tsunami I was referring to. My company has its own clear strategy.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By old duffer on 3/17/2007 8:36 AM
Bud???How do you see cox and the sec playing this now?

Has the potencial for a massive blow up gotten too big for them to survive forcing their hand?

Thanks,just a old duffer trying to survive himself.

Reply: The weight of evidence against NSS had simply become overwhelming.

I don't know the rest of the dynamics, bu Aguirre certainly helped us indirectly.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/17/2007 2:17 PM
I have two words that will answer every question regarding who is responsible for all of this naked short mess. Federal Reserve. Assisted by Prime Brokers headed by GoldMan Sachs et al. Now the question is how do we stop an entity this powerful? Bud ..a little help here!!

Reply: The Fed will have to stop itself. Political pressure to liquidate it willl be the bellweather. Watch for more resignations, and for trouble getting anyone to join the Fed's BOD.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By clearthinker on 3/18/2007 12:44 PM
please elaborate on the Federal Reserve's role in naked short/FTD. Sees to me that the core of this nest is PIPE lending hedge funds, the banks who provide hedge funds with money, the primes that look the other way on settlement day, a DTC that won't provide transparency because it has been caught not doing its job, and an SEC that was lax...

Please shed light on the Fed's role here

Reply to Clearthinker:

The FR has known all about this for years. The DTCC leveraged lending model parallels many of the features of the Fractional Reserve Lending model used by the FR. The DTCC hasn't provided transparency because it would expose their very significant financial interest in the shorting game.

The SEC wasn't lax, it was deserving a wholesale investigation into their pecuniary interest in not just shorting, but all forms of arbitrage and market making. It is one of the few major agencies whose employees are permitted to take jobs in the industry they are regulating without a one to two year waiting period.

The enormous scope of this scandal makes the FR the only unit capable of a bail out, as they did with Long Term Capital Managment.

DTCC advertises itself as a Fed Reserve associate. They can't be in that position without FR oversight. Numerous communicators have told the SEC, DOJ and more that very thing.

The Federal Reserve makes its regulated 6% every year for its owners (the major banks and prime brokers) whether the Market goes up or down. They are totally insulated against the risks they expect individual investors to accept without recourse.

When the FR was created in 1914, 14 US States "opted out" of that system. A major focus component of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 was specifically to "reel in" those states, particuarly Texas, Oklahoma, and more. Millions were bankrupted personally, and unlike the Long Term Capital debacle, the Fed DID NOT STEP IN TO BAIL OUT THESE INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDERS.

The Fed is everywhere in this mess. If anyone thinks $4 to $8 Trillion dollars could have been syphoned off US retirement and investment accounts without them seeing it, then they are completely blind.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/19/2007 1:49 AM
Bud, now that was the missing piece that I was waitng to read. Thank you so much!!!
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/19/2007 11:35 AM
Wall St Trade Groups See Big Harm From Hedge-Fund Disclosure
Two trade associations that count among its members Wall Street's biggest financial-services firms asked a judge Thursday to reconsider an order forcing hedge funds to disclose trading activity, saying it would do "serious" harm to corporate bankruptcy reorganizations.
In papers filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan, the Loan Syndications and Trading Association and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association asked Judge Allan Gropper to rescind the order. Gropper last week instructed more than a dozen hedge funds involved in the Northwest Airlines Corp. (NWACQ) Chapter 11 case to disclose how much company stock and debt they bought, and at what price.

The associations said the order, "by requiring the disclosure of proprietary and highly confidential information, will in all likelihood erect a substantial obstacle to the participation of many stakeholders - in particular those sophisticated stakeholders who are the most likely to have the means and the experience to make a positive contribution toward reorganization." The request to Gropper was made a day after the hedge funds facing his disclosure order appealed the decision to a federal district judge. At a hearing Thursday, Gropper also considered a request from some of the funds to reconsider. The funds, which had been ordered to disclose their trading data by Wednesday, have argued that forced disclosure would have a "chilling effect" on hedge funds' willingness to participate in bankruptcy reorganizations.

The Wall Street trade associations, whose members include Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER), made the same argument Thursday. They said that "many, if not most" of their members were surprised by Gropper's decision, and that it could have a "serious detrimental impact" on future Chapter 11 reorganizations.

The associations said they took no position on the dispute between Northwest Airlines and the hedge funds subject to the disclosure order. Many of those funds bought Northwest's stock after the company began its bankruptcy reorganization, and have been upset by the company's Chapter 11 plan, which leaves stockholders with nothing. Some of the funds have argued that Northwest's stock could be worth as much as $33.50 a share in the event of a merger with another airline.

"Although the debtors and certain equity holders are at odds in these cases, there are countless examples in other cases where groups of stakeholders have cooperated, many times in the guise of 'ad hoc' committees, to create imaginative and strikingly successful solutions," the associations said in their court papers.

The funds facing the disclosure requirement include Owl Creek Asset Management, Anchorage Capital Group, Citadel L.P., Gracie Capital, Greywolf Capital Management, Latigo Partners, Marathon Asset Management, Mason Capital Management, Sandell Asset Management Corp., Savannah-Baltimore Capital Management LLC, Seneca Capital and Taconic Capital Advisors LLC.

In the papers they filed with the bankruptcy court, the funds said they currently face a "Hobson's choice" between "active participation in the (Northwest) bankruptcy and protection of their commercial interests."

Gropper ruled last week that Rule 2019 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code required the funds to disclose their because they were conducting their activities in the Northwest bankruptcy case as an unofficial committee.

"Rule 2019 protects other members of the group - here, the shareholders - and informs them where a committee is coming from by requiring full disclosure of the securities held by members of the committee and the respective purchases and sales," Gropper said.

-Joseph Rebello,


Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/19/2007 11:36 AM
Bud, how about this move by PNMS?

PANAMERSA Corporation (PNMS) Partner DESIMPLEX to Supply New Trading Software to the Newly Formed PDR Exchange (Panama), Inc.
Market Wire - March 19, 2007 12:49 PM ET


Related Quotes
Symbol Last Chg
PNMS Trade 0.0025 -0.0002
Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes

PANAMERSA Corporation (PINKSHEETS: PNMS) announces Partner DESIMPLEX is in the final Beta testing of PDR trading software to be used by the newly formed Stock Trading company PDR Exchange (Panama), Inc.

PDR Exchange (Panama), Inc. will be an operating company of Fundacion Pan America and will be the engine used to trade receipts issued by Fundacion Pan America. Known as a Pan American Depository Receipt (PDR), it allows beneficial owners of the Fundacion to buy and sell PDRs online anywhere in the world. This will in effect create a private trading system that is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to anyone in the world who has a computer and is a beneficiary of the Fundacion. The beauty of the system is it completely eliminates any naked shorting or manipulation of Share Price (PPS) by brokers and market makers, while giving the individual beneficiary complete anonymity.

PANAMERSA Corporation (PNMS) CEO Mike Terrell stated, "The completion of this software coupled with the benefits of a Panamanian Private Fundacion makes the present system obsolete. People in the stock markets, the average investors, are getting their pocket picked every day by the system. The Market Makers and brokers have taken over and manipulate naked short sell, which is selling shares they don't even own, costing the average investor millions each year. PANAMERSA Corporation is a good example," said Terrell. "We announced 3rd Quarter earnings that were up over 2500% over the second quarter and our PPS went down. We followed with 4th Quarter earnings up over 500% yet our PPS was manipulated down. The company is doing great but our shareholders are taking a beating so I have offered all our shareholders a one year minimum price Guarantee of $0.02 per share and a 2 year Guarantee of $ 0.04 per share if they will pull their certs and become a beneficiary of the Fundacion. This will be the new way of doing business on a global scale and is the wave of the future." For more info on see www.blog.panamersa.com.

PANAMERSA Corporation (PINKSHEETS: PNMS) is a holding company for a group of business enterprises which promotes the commercial integration of Latin America into the economic development of the Western Hemisphere. PANAMERSA Corporation is engaged in global e-commerce and e-biz solutions offering interactive e-commerce and e-biz programs in addition to a range of goods and services online including: prepaid Debit cards; e-commerce merchant accounts; life insurance policies, gold transactions; telephony services, text messaging, VoIP, MicroForests properties, real estate investment participations, fixed and variable income real estate properties in Costa Rica and Panama, offshore financial services, asset management and protection; travel services, leisure, business, health, relocation services, and digital marketing services.

Forward-looking statements are not historical facts as "forward-looking statements" defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Our forward-looking statements are the result of profound analysis on trends in our globalizing economies that we anticipate in our industry. It is our good faith vision and estimate of the effect on the globalization, integration and electronic business trends will have on our company. Our statements are also subject to risks and uncertainties beyond our reasonable control that could cause the results of operations to differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements.

Contact:
Investor Relations
214-774-4870
ir@panamersa.com


SOURCE: PANAMERSA Corporation

mailto:ir@panamersa.com
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/20/2007 8:08 AM
For all to read!!

CRAMER REVEALS A BIT TOO MUCH

By RODDY BOYD
JIM CRAMER
Barking mad.March 20, 2007 -- Flamboyant Wall Street trader turned TV host Jim Cramer, not known for being the shy, retiring type, might have said too much in a video interview he did for a financial Web site.

The host of CNBC's daily program "Mad Money" had hedge fund-trading desks buzzing yesterday after he bragged about manipulating stock prices during his days as a trader.

In the video from TheStreet.com's "Wall Street Confidential" Webcast, Cramer boasts about manipulating the price of a high-flying stock down, and even acknowledges that doing so might have been illegal. The video is making the rounds on YouTube.

"A lot of times when I was short, I would create a level of activity beforehand that would drive the futures. . . . It's a fun game," Cramer said in the Webcast, which was moderated by TheStreet.com Executive Editor Aaron Task.

Cramer later said that "no one else in the world would ever admit that, but I don't care."

However, seconds later, he acknowledged, "I'm not going to say that on TV," referring to his show on CNBC.

A remarkably successful money manager when he ran the $450 million Cramer Berkowitz hedge fund, Cramer in the Webcast shared his "tips" on how to drive a stock price down so that a short-position - a bet that a stock price would drop - remains profitable.

He added that the strategy - while illegal - was safe enough because, "the Securities and Exchange Commission never understands this."

A call to Cramer was not returned.

http://www.nypost.com:80/seven/03202007/business/cramer_reveals_a_bit_too_much_business_roddy_boyd.htm

Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Howie on 3/22/2007 5:32 AM
We all owe it to ourselves, and to our country, to peddle this video to everyone we know....let's keep this issue in the public eye!
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/22/2007 9:33 AM
Bud, is it possible to update us on the upcomming Tsusami? When last you commented is was postponed to or thru the end of March and no later than mid April. Is that still about the same timeframe as these delays are just allowing more interesting fodder to be unleashed to the public. I think this item could be the final nail!!!!

I'd guess this will be out in Mid-April.

B.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Sean on 3/23/2007 7:45 AM
Bud in the past you have made certain feelings and oropinions you have about CMKM Diamonds known. I am also a shareholder/cert holder in that debacle. My question is this. If the SEC has the info. they need to nail the insiders for wrong doing like they did to this company in VERY short order what is the hold-up. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated!!

SEC charges CyberKey, CEO with stock hype scheme
Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:30am ET
Market View
CKYS (CyberKey Solutions Inc )
Last: $0.00
Change: +0.00 (+100.00%)
Revenue (ttm): --M
EPS: --
Market Cap: --M
Time: 3:34pm ET



Stock Details
Company Profile
Analyst Research
Company News:
SEC charges CyberKey, CEO with stock hype scheme
More Company News... Email This Article | Print This Article | Reprints [-] Text [+]
WASHINGTON, March 20 (Reuters) - Securities regulators said on Tuesday they have charged Utah-based CyberKey Solutions Inc. (CKYS.PK: Quote, Profile , Research) and its chief executive with promoting a stock offering while hyping false information of a lucrative deal with the Department of Homeland Security.

CyberKey and its chief executive, James Plant, made at least $1.5 million from an unregistered offering of company shares between November 2005 and the present, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said.

The investor protection agency said the company promoted the stock offering with a series of false press releases about a purchase order worth more than $24 million from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for CyberKey's flash memory drives.

Attorneys for CyberKey and Plant were not immediately available for comment.


Reuters Pictures

Editors Choice: Best pictures
from the last 24 hours.
View Slideshow

"CyberKey and its CEO orchestrated an intense fraud campaign that clearly duped investors - in the three months leading up to the first of CyberKey's alleged multiple false press releases, CyberKey trading volume was just over 550,000 shares per day - but once the scheme began, daily trading volume swelled dramatically to between 10 million and 80 million shares per day," said Cheryl Scarboro, the SEC's enforcement division associate director, in a statement.

Plant is also facing a criminal case and was arrested last week by the FBI on charges of securities fraud and aiding and abetting securities fraud, the SEC said.


© Reuters 2007. All Rights Reserved.

Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Howie on 3/23/2007 11:38 AM
http://cmkxunitedforum.proboards70.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1173925519&page=3

"We went from
#44 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
#39 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
#33 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
DISAPPEARED!





#30 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
#27 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
#22 - Most Viewed (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
DISAPPEARED!





#17 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
#17 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
#14 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - All
to
DISAPPEARED!



#16 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
#16 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
#13 - Top Favorites (This Week) - News & Politics - English
to
DISAPPEARED!



Is this how it works? You improve everyday in the ratings and one day, you are GONE?

Anyone know how this happened? Is this normal with YOUTUBE?"
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By Mike on 3/23/2007 11:40 AM
SEC Seeks To 'Modernize' Short-Selling Regs - Official


http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20070323%5cACQDJON200703230951DOWJONESDJONLINE000728.htm&

Here is the text of the message:

Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:54 AM
To: Bud Burrell
Subject: The SEC has proposed changes



Hello Bud !





Did you see this ? How close we are !?



http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20070323%5cACQDJON200703230951DOWJONESDJONLINE000728.htm&





SEC Seeks To 'Modernize' Short-Selling Regs - Official

By Daisy Maxey, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- The Securities and Exchange Commission is taking a " carefully honed approach" in its efforts to address short-selling abuses with as little restriction as possible and is hoping to make recommendations by late spring, an SEC official said.

The goal is to modernize regulations to prevent abusive and manipulative short-selling practices with minimal impact on liquidity, James Brigagliano, an associate director in the SEC's market regulation division, said Thursday. Brigagliano made his comments at an educational seminar on regulatory issues for hedge fund managers sponsored by the Managed Funds Association, a hedge fund trade group.

On the sidelines of the conference, held at the City University of New York, he also discussed briefly the commission's efforts to look into the practice of some big investors, including hedge funds, to vote shares that they have borrowed, but don't own.

Short sellers borrow shares, then sell them, hoping that they can buy the shares back later at a lower price to repay their loan. Some sell shares that they haven't actually borrowed, which is known as naked short selling. Short selling is a common practice among many hedge funds.

The SEC has proposed changes to three regulations - one governing short selling in connection with public offerings; another governing failure to deliver shares on time after a stock transaction; and a short-sale price test, which restricts the prices at which short sales may be executed.

The commission proposed in December that Rule 105, which governs short selling in connection with public offerings, be altered. The rule bars a person who sells short just before an offering is made from covering that short sale using securities purchased in the offering. It's meant to prevent activities that may artificially depress market prices and reduce offering prices, but there have been numerous violations, Brigagliano said. "In recent years we have brought a number of actions" related to violations of the rule, he said.

The commission recommended in December that any short seller be banned from purchasing any security in the offering during the Rule 105 restriction period. The period to file comments on the proposed change ended in February, and the commission is now reviewing the 13 comments it received, Brigagliano said.

The commission also proposed an amendment in July that would eliminate one provision and limit another provision of a regulation known as Regulation SHO, which governs failure to deliver shares on time after stock transactions take place. The regulation, which went into effect in January 2005, imposes close-out requirements on broker-dealers for securities in which a substantial number of failures to deliver have occurred. The commission recommended eliminating a provision known as the "grandfather clause," which exempts some failure to deliver from the closeout requirement. It also proposed narrowing an exception for registered options market makers.

The commission will consider how any change in Reg SHO could affect prime brokerage arrangements, he said.

In addition, the commission has proposed the elimination of the short-sale price test, commonly know as the "tick test." The "tick test," meant to prevent downward manipulation of stock prices, allows short sales only at a price above the last sale price.

The rule has been in place since 1938 despite significant developments in the marketplace, Brigagliano said. Decimalization and changes in market strategies have undermined the effectiveness of the test, he said. "The current price test may not be a good fit for the modern markets," he said.

The commission started a pilot program in 2004 to test the short-sale price restriction by temporarily suspending the rule on about 1,000 securities, and concluded that those stocks weren't more susceptible to patterns associated with downward manipulation, Brigagliano said.

The comment period on the elimination of the "tick test" ended in February, and the commission is reviewing the 26 comments it received, he said.

As for the practice by large investors to sway corporate contests by voting shares that they don't actually own, Brigagliano said that the issue is important to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. The commission is collecting information and "will discuss at some point in the future what, if any, change we would recommend to insure that votes are properly counted," he said.

-By Daisy Maxey, Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 4048; daisy.maxey@dowjones.com



Bud Burrell wrote:

Batten down the hatches. People are going to prison, if there is any justice left in this frucacta legal system.



Best, Bud.
Re: 1st Day You Tube Stats out on Phantom Shares by Bloomberg. By StockDiesel on 4/1/2007 6:03 PM
Bud, Is the company in question CSHD? Thank you

No, it is not. The good news is many shareholders of many companies will be able to make similar claims, using the coming complaint as a model.
Copyright © 2006 The Sanity Check   |   Privacy Statement   |   Terms Of Use